At the risk of boring you with another of these so soon, this one was actually interesting to me because I have no idea what brought me to it. I was in and out of sleep for awhile before it “arrived”.

All over the Earth they plunder with mirth,

they steal and they waste what they hunt.

The bellicose masses – those angry jackasses -

what more could they possibly want?

I’m not much for poetry. I rarely read it and even more rarely care to write it. For me, it requires a different mode than “constructing a tale.” It’s only when it comes into my head from nowhere that I feel it’s worth half a damn to write. I fail at any attempt to create it at will.

What does it mean? Well, it’s not particularly subtle. I suppose it’s a reflection of my overall anger at the greed and strife in the world, but I’m not much of a bleeding heart type, either. Sure, world peace would be great, but I won’t be holding my breath …

As I head deeper into my thirties (my birthday is coming very soon), my cynicism and quiet resignation are balancing out to about equal.

 

Today I was proud to stand with my colleagues and receive the 2009 National Institute of Allergy & Infectious Diseases Chief Information Officer Award for our hard work on the Papillomavirus Episteme (PaVE).

PaVE is a public-facing research tool for biologists researching the Papillomaviridae family of viruses. I was (and continue to be) the usability analyst and UI designer for the project. The team includes Yasmin Mohomoud, Vivek Gopalan, Sandya Bandaru, Qina Tan, Jason Barnett, and Yongjian (Jason) Guo, Leo (Li) Lu, as well as myself. Congratulations, all!

My 2009 NIAID CIO Award for My Work on PaVE

C. Montgomery Burns Voice: Ehhhxcellence.

 

Caleb Crain wrote an article about the use of “camel case” (MasterCard, iPhone, AnythingNotSeparatedWithSpaces) on the New York Times. His point: Camel case is evil and must be destroyed.

In other words, though camel case may have been spurred by recent technology, its effect is regressive — in fact, medieval.

Absurd.

It reeks of angry old man. That’s not a commentary on his age – I have no idea how old Caleb actually is – but rather on his tone. As I’m reading it, I imagine his voice thickening and tears welling up in his eyes Glenn-Beck-style as he watches “his language” ruined before his eyes.

“Things are changing!” he’d yell, shaking his fist. “I don’t like change. I’m scared! Where am I?”

“Mr. Crain,” I’d tell him, “it’ll be alright. EverSame isn’t a home, it’s a retirement getaway.”

EverSame! That’s camel case too, isn’t it! Oh, God, it’s true!

At this point I’d realize my error but it would be too late. I’d give an “okay” nod toward the orderlies, who would immediately swoop in, one holding Caleb down while the other jabs him with a syringe full of sedatives.

I’d watch him weaken and eventually slip into a fitful sleep. I’d cry a little. Then I’d remind myself it’s for the best.

I mean, he actually said he wouldn’t show an example of camel case directly as it would “disfigure” his prose. He made two points to which I take particular exception.

Camel Case is Regressive and Medieval

Come now, Old Man Crain. What must you think of contractions? You assert camel case is regressive to the point of being medieval because of the loss of spacing and, therefore, readability. You draw parallels between this and the vowelless ancient Greek language. Far more than word spacing is lost in a contraction. For example, can not becomes can’t. In case you hadn’t noticed, a space, a vowel, and a consonant are lost in that brutish abuse of the English language. The very thought must bring you to tears. You and this guy have a lot to discuss.

I eagerly await your next article, Contractions Are the Tools of the Cave Men.

It’s Our Language, Don’t Let it Change

Yes, Caleb. It is our language and we are the ones changing it. As with contractions, we develop shortcuts over time to eliminate needless tedium and increase the efficacy of our words. Some of them may seem scary (and even stupid) at first, but it’s quite common for some of those mutations to become the accepted norm. Just like contractions once did. The stupid ones live on a few decades at best, dying out with the generation that invented them. Survival of the most useful, as it were.

You see, Caleb, language is dynamic and alive. It lives and changes just as culture lives and changes. Old parts die off and new parts are added (either by invention or adoption). This is a good thing. It allows us to be more expressive in our modern era and to discuss new(ish) ideas fluently. The dead should not govern the living.

Do try and keep up.

 

Like anyone else, I worry over the things most important to me as I drift off to sleep. As I approach and enter the hypnagogic state – where free association and the subconscious seem to take over – my thoughts take on an entirely different form. Sometimes odd scenes play out with a voice narrating in my head. Because most people look at me strangely when I say this, I’ve concluded it must not be universal, therefore it must be the aspiring writer in me. I decided recently to begin recording those thoughts when I’m awake enough to do so. Here’s the first one, captured last night.

Pretext – I clearly remember the train of thought that led up to this narrative. Through many winding what-ifs, I found myself thinking of large monasteries and a scholarly lifestyle. Such communities are often closed off, miniature worlds all their own. Those thoughts were the last things on my mind as I began to drift off. Then this came to me, in a low, lamenting voice, as if I were the narrator’s confidant:

Abernathy, our caretaker – his eyes deep and caring, his face hard and disapproving. He was our trusted leader.

Why, then, did he lie to us? What noble purpose justified this deception? We’ll never know – he is lost to us now, and we are lost without him.

God help us, what will we do?

It was haunting enough to jolt me out of sleep, so I set it down on paper before I forgot it. The prose needs work (the first sentence is a fragment), but it’s intriguing enough. To those of you without much creative drive (not an insult, just different wiring), you’ll likely see no value in this. Even if you enjoy the occasional novel, a few dramatic sentences in a vacuum are more frustrating than intriguing.

To me, however, this kind of brief, cryptic narrative is like discovering the entrance to a lost tomb, or a treasure map, or a long-forgotten alien space ship in perfect working order. It’s an invitation to an adventure that promises to change the lives of those involved. It’s drama, adventure, intrigue, struggle, heartache, and triumph. It makes my mind reel at the possibilities and my heart ache for the plight of the characters.

In short, for people like me, this stuff is like a highly-addictive drug. While it’s playing out in my head, few things are important enough to even register, let alone steal my attention away.

I’m going to make it a point to publish the more coherent, flowing bits here … at least those not belonging to my ever-ongoing-but-seemingly-never-really-progressing novel. Maybe it’ll inspire some of you. Funny enough, I think that’s really all any writer truly wants anyway – beyond income considerations, that is.

© 2011 Joshua NozziJoshua Nozzi is a Cocoa developer for hire.Suffusion theme by Sayontan Sinha